Skip to main content
TrustRadius
Veritas Enterprise Vault

Veritas Enterprise Vault

Overview

What is Veritas Enterprise Vault?

Veritas Enterprise Vault is a file archiving option.

Read more
Recent Reviews
Read all reviews
Return to navigation

Pricing

View all pricing
N/A
Unavailable

What is Veritas Enterprise Vault?

Veritas Enterprise Vault is a file archiving option.

Entry-level set up fee?

  • No setup fee

Offerings

  • Free Trial
  • Free/Freemium Version
  • Premium Consulting/Integration Services

Would you like us to let the vendor know that you want pricing?

34 people also want pricing

Alternatives Pricing

What is Microsoft Exchange Online Archiving?

Exchange Online Archiving from Microsoft is a tool that helps the user solve archiving, compliance, regulatory, and eDiscovery challenges. Hosted on Microsoft globally redundant servers, with IT-level phone support 24 hours a day, seven days a week, Exchange Online Archiving is compatible with…

What is ManageEngine ADAudit Plus?

ADAudit Plus offers real-time monitoring, user and entity behaviour analytics, and change audit reports that helps users keep AD and IT infrastructure secure and compliant.Track all changes to Windows AD objects including users, groups, computers, GPOs, and OUs.Achieve hybrid AD monitoring with a…

Return to navigation

Product Demos

Exporting from Enterprise Vault using Archive Accelerator

YouTube

Enterprise Vault Suite: Stale File Deletion Demo

YouTube
Return to navigation

Product Details

What is Veritas Enterprise Vault?

Veritas Enterprise Vault Technical Details

Operating SystemsUnspecified
Mobile ApplicationNo
Return to navigation

Comparisons

View all alternatives
Return to navigation

Reviews and Ratings

(26)

Attribute Ratings

Reviews

(1-4 of 4)
Companies can't remove reviews or game the system. Here's why
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
The overall experience has been satisfactory. EV Archiving is the best tool to store all your emails and documents securely. The vault is available in the cloud and we can access documents from anywhere. I have been using Veritas Vault to ensure that all messages I receive in my inbox are also saved in Veritas. It has interesting functions such as storing only copies as read-only in the safe, which does not allow accidental deletion of documents.
  • Improve business process agility.
  • Improve compliance & risk management.
  • Automatic retention strategy.
  • Data Lost Prevention technology.
  • The search function in the vault does not work very well.
  • Cost. If not planned diligently, it might add to the overall cost.
  • Not easy get a expert to address the issue fast.
It is not linked to a specific hardware component and can be installed on any platform. It is a perfect solution for basically all companies and the user experience is simple and easy to use. Another positive point is that it has become the best solution for archiving emails and secret documents. The points of attention revolve around the cost for companies with many users. If there is no planning, it can become a major cost.
  • Create internal/operational efficiencies.
  • Drive innovation.
  • Product functionality and performance.
  • Support still needs improvement.
VE is Very robust and has a good granularity on the archiving rules. The IE shortcuts allowed us to quickly and easily archive the data while allowing users to still access their data via the web. Have great speed of archiving data and your frontend is easier for users. The Retention periods could be set to keep archives for a certain amount of time and the automatic metric to choose the best form is a differential.
Sheldon Eng | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
At our company we implemented FSA, SharePoint and Exchange. We initially deployed FSA with the intention of reducing total cost of storage in our DFS File Server environment. Our environment was complex with multiple copies of the data set so using FSA reduced our storage foot dramatically. This also helped us address our inability to backup our large environment with our DFS environment. We later implemented SharePoint and Exchange archiving to further reduce storage footprint.
  • EV FSA had 2 stubbing options. We ended up using the IE shortcut as the stub replacement on the file system. In the DFS environment using DFSR the IE shortcuts allowed us to quickly and easily archive the data while allowing users to still access their data via the web or stub format. We were also able to exclude certain folders from archiving like the dfsrprivate folder. The newer versions of EV 11 and up have a better user interface to access this content from the web.
  • EV SharePoint implementation was pretty simple for us. Document Library archiving was pretty seamless. Archiving the different versions in sharepoint also helped further reduce total cost of storage.
  • EV Exchange was a good addition to our archiving portfolio. In our case we did not use the stubbing mechanism. Instead, we used the vault cache methodology. We had the option to pull down the full archive versus just the header information. The concern at the time was how quickly we could update the vault cache on the client. We ended up scaling out our EV environment to ensure the push of data could get to all our clients since we were in the middle of a notes to exchange migration. Overall I was impressed with Vault Cache and its capabilities. I also liked the ability to manage the Vault Cache and perform resets where necessary from the web browser interface.
  • We had EV FSA, SharePoint and Exchange as one single environment so we benefited from overall single instances of a file. Our backend systems were Netapp which we enabled deduplication for further improve storage savings. EV had a good SQL Reporting mechanism for Archiving and plenty of good canned reports.
  • Speed of archiving data was pretty fast.
  • The last version I was involved in was version 10. EV FSA IE Stubs were not intelligent at all. It was simply a short cut which bought us a lot of flexibility on one end but lacked intelligence to do anything with it. Moving IE stubs from one location on the file system to another was also challenging as the permissions had to be synced up. There needs to be proven well documented process to walk operations through the details.
  • EV SharePoint at the time lacked support for archiving blog type content.
  • We used Veritas EV Agent to backup Enterprise Vault. However, agent based solutions lacked performance but setup was significantly easier. The best option is to use Snap Shots to backup your archive. There are a set of powershell scripts that can help with ensuring the vault stores are backed up using these technologies.
  • FSA IE shortcuts had no icons of the original file.
Not sure about Discovery DA in Enterprise Vault. Should attempt to leverage Clearwell to address the ediscovery pieces.
  • Reduced a significant portion of File Services data sitting on primary storage by 35%.
  • We were primarily a Notes shop and we started migrating to Exchange we took the opportunity to keep the Exchange mail boxes relatively small. In so doing all the data coming from Notes DB went straight to the Vault in the form of a Vault Cache for the client.
We evaluated Z Technologies and EMC archiving solutions. EMC archiving solution was not cohesive at the time. They had one for mail archiving and another product for file services archiving. I wanted a single solution targeting different platforms so that additional storage efficiency could be achieved. Z Technologies wasn't bad but a much small company compared to Symantec / Veritas. Their solution appeared to more difficult to configure and to setup. They had an AD syncing mechanism where it synced our production AD against a copy of ldap objects in Z technologies. did not like the fact that there was going to be another ldap repository.
Ryan Hanzalik | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 8 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
We use Symantec Enterprise for antivirus, backups and system images for disaster recovery. We use all three products listed across our global corporation for servers and Symantec Endpoint Protection for workstations.

These products address three key business problems:

1) Having the same antivirus software installed across all devices
2) Having daily and weekly backups of servers at every remote site (600+ sites)
3) Having the same product family our engineers are already familiar for our disaster recovery solution
  • Symantec Enterprise Endpoint Protection is a solid antivirus client. It has protected our organization from hundreds of disastrous infections
  • Symantec Enterprise Backup Exec has made backing up our remote sites and managing them effortless
  • Symantec Enterprise System Recovery has allowed us to take system images and stand them up quickly at our DR site
  • Symantec Endpoint Protection could have an easier to use reporting module. It is not intuitive at all to use
  • Symantec Backup Exec could have better pricing on extra options
  • Symantec Enterprise could have a better centralized management server option
Many of the server edition modules for Symantec Enterprise are the best in the industry, bar none. I would select their products every time for servers.
However, there are better workstation options out on the market.
Key questions to ask during the selection process:
1) It really comes down to price, what type of budget do you have?
2) Extra modules for any product normally cost extra, so make sure you buy the modules you need when you need them
3) Do want all your modules to exist under one platform or are you only looking at the cost and do not care about mixing & matching?
  • Implementing Symantec Enterprise has had a huge, positive impact on our business objectives by giving our business recovery options that enable us to rebuild any remote server in a couple of hours. Versus having to rebuild them from the ground up which takes 4-6 hours.
  • Implementing Symantec Enterprise has allowed us to have a quicker turnaround with DR tests for physical servers. Using their product has cut the DR test time in half!
  • Implementing Symantec Enterprise has kept our regional virus outbreaks to 0.
  • Viruses are quarantined instantly whenever infections are copied to one of the hundreds of File Servers in our region.
We acquired servers from another company through an acquisition that had McAfee installed. It was difficult to manage any of the clients connected and the management server itself had to be restarted on a daily basis. I am aware of an alternative product known as Trend Micro, but I do not have any experience in the using the product or how to manage it in a enterprise environment.
Symantec Enterprise is one of the best in the industry. We have already deployed their product to thousands of devices in the company and it would be a huge project to go through and change to an alternative product. We have also had much luck in dealing with their customer support. They have been very pleasant to deal with and their technical support has been quite knowledgeable in fixing our issues. This leaves us with very little reason to switch to a new product. We would have to see a significant amount of cost savings to switch to an alternative that offers all the same features and modules.
Mark Foss | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 7 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
It is used by my entire enterprise for email archival and compliance reasons. It has a twofold purpose, to keep mailbox sizes down and to keep a copy of messages for compliance requirements and retention.
  • Single instance storage is an important feature. Despite the cost of storage going down commercially, data center storage is still rather costly and email has exploded in its sizes across the board. Microsoft has done away with single instance storage in their products despite the fact that email is commonly sent to multiples and groups of people.
  • Giving structure to email is what Enterprise Vault does. Since email has an unstructured database, structure generally helps for faster searches and indexing. With a well tuned EV system, excellent and complex searches can be obtained.
  • Symantec has always provided excellent Technical support to their EV product. I have always been pleased with their support when I have been deeply perplexed by an issue.
  • Enterprise Vault is a complex product and requires good administrative support. This can be tough for short staffed companies needing a system that is more "setup and forget" while working other other IT systems. I wish EV was a bit more easy to administer.
  • Be careful about the Vault Store choices you make. There are some proprietary storage systems that EV supports that modifies they way items are stored. (like, Hitachi Streamer Storage, HCP). If you ever need to migrate away from one storage system to another - do not use proprietary formatted vault storage systems. If you ask me, Symantec should not certify any storage system that uses a proprietary format.
Enterprise Vault is useful with a well staffed IT organization as it requires having a dedicated support staff.
  • Quicker access and support for eDiscovery requests on email from Legal dept.
  • Difficult to maintain without more dedicated time to support the system.
I have not been able to evaluate other products.
We will not be able to use another product for a while. We are unable to migrate from it quickly. But, we will keep considering this product when we begin evaluations.
Return to navigation